2009 HONDA CR-V Structure Problems

The contact owns a 2009 Honda CR-V. The contact stated while driving at approximately 15 MPH, the rear passenger’s side wheel started to feel abnormal on the roadway. No warning light was illuminated. The contact pulled over to the shoulder of the roadway and became aware that the rear passenger’s side wheel was sunken into the mud flap cover of the vehicle. The vehicle was towed to the residence and then to the local dealer the following day. The vehicle was diagnosed as unrepairable under NHTSA Campaign Number: 23V228000 (Structure). The contact was informed of a possible buy-back. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 230,000.

The contact owns a 2009 Honda CR-V. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 23V228000 (Structure). The contact stated that the vehicle was taken to the dealer where it remained. The vehicle was inspected, and it was determined that the rear subframe was damaged beyond repair due to extreme corrosion. The contact was informed by the dealer that a case would be opened. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and the contact was informed that she would receive a call back however, the contact had not yet received the call back. The failure mileage was unknown. Parts distribution disconnect.

The contact owns a 2009 Honda CR-V. The contact stated while driving 55 MPH, the vehicle started shaking and vibrating. The contact stated that the check engine warning light was illuminated. The vehicle had recently been repaired under NHTSA Campaign Number: 23V228000 (Structure). The contact stated that the vehicle was shaking and vibrating at various speeds. The vehicle was taken to the yearly State vehicle inspection and the state inspectors refused to complete the inspection due to the extreme corrosion and holes in the rear sub frame. The vehicle was then taken to another State Inspection station and the contact was informed that the vehicle would not pass the State Inspection. The contact called the manufacturer and a manufacturer inspection had been scheduled. The vehicle had not been repaired. The failure mileage was 157,034.

The contact owns a 2009 Honda CR-V. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 23V228000 (Structure) however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The local dealer was contacted. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure. Parts distribution disconnect.

The contact owns a 2009 Honda CR-V. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 23V228000 (Structure) however, the dealer advised the contact that the extent of the rust on the vehicle prevented the recall repair from being performed. The contact stated that the manufacturer made an offer to buy back the vehicle however, the contact believed that the offer was unreasonable. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 70,500. Parts distribution disconnect.

The contact owns a 2009 Honda CR-V. The contact stated that the fuel tank guard had separated. The contact stated upon inspecting the subframe, he noticed that the frame was severely corroded. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic, where it was diagnosed that the subframe needed to be replaced. The contact later received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 23V228000 (Structure) and the vehicle was taken to the dealer for the recall repair. The contact stated upon picking up the vehicle from the dealer, he noticed that the dealer had only installed a support brace as per the manufacturer's instructions and to repair the subframe as needed. The contact stated that the dealer advised that the subframe was severely corroded, however, the dealer stated that they had completed the recall repair as per the manufacturer's instructions. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time...

The contact owns a 2009 Honda CR-V. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 23V228000 (Structure) however, the repair was attempted, but the vehicle was not repaired. The vehicle was declared undrivable by the dealer. The contact stated that the manufacturer had been contacted by the dealer and the manufacturer stated the vehicle was drivable. The dealer recommended that the contact not drive the vehicle and the vehicle was left at the dealer. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue. The failure mileage was approximately 222,000. Parts distribution disconnect.

The contact's mother owns a 2009 Honda CR-V. The contact's mother received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 23V228000 (Structure) and the vehicle was taken to the dealer for the recall repair. The contact stated that the dealer inspected the vehicle and informed his mother that no issues were found, and to drive the vehicle to the residence. However, the contact stated that the manufacturer was contacted and advised the contact that they had received a report from the dealer stating that the vehicle was beyond repair. The manufacturer informed the contact that a case had been opened and they were working on buying back the vehicle. The contact stated that the case manager was unreachable. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The contact's mother had not experienced a failure. Parts distribution disconnect.

The contact owns a 2009 Honda CR-V. The contact stated while driving 25 MPH, the vehicle lost motive power, the trailing arm fractured, and the vehicle swerved off the roadway. The vehicle was previously inspected under NHTSA Campaign Number: 23V228000 (Structure). The vehicle was towed to the same dealer and inspected. The contact was informed that there was severe rust on the frame. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure, and a case was filed. The failure mileage was approximately 180,000.

The contact owns a 2009 Honda CR-V. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed, she heard a loud booming sound and the vehicle started to swerve left and right. The contact was able to maneuver the vehicle off the road. The contact stated that upon inspecting the vehicle, she noticed that the rear driver’s side tire had detached. The vehicle was towed to an independent mechanic where it was diagnosed that the rear frame was rusted and needed to be repaired. The vehicle was not repaired. Neither the dealer nor manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was unavailable.