NHTSA Complaint #11254112 — 2015 TESLA MODEL S

ON MAY 20, 2019, THIS CAR WAS ISSUED A FORCED, OTA-UPDATE FROM TESLA, VERSIONS 2019.16.1 AND 2019.16.2 AS A RESULT OF WHAT IS BELIEVED TO BE A RESPONSE TO THE SERIES OF MULTIPLE BATTERY FIRES WORLDWIDE INVOLVING TESLA'S ELECTRIC VEHICLES. WITHOUT DISCLOSING WHAT THE SOFTWARE UPDATES WOULD DO OR WHAT NEGATIVE AFFECTS THEY WOULD HAVE, TESLA FORCED THESE UPDATES WITHOUT TELLING MY CLIENT AND OTHER AFFECTED OWNERS THAT THEIR BATTERIES WOULD BE LIMITED AND CHARGING SPEEDS WOULD BE THROTTLED, EFFECTIVELY AND SIGNIFICANTLY DECREASING THE RANGE AND SPEED OF CHARGING FOR THEIR CARS. TESLA ADVERTISED MY CLIENT'S SPECIFIC YEAR, MAKE AND MODEL (2015 MODEL S 70D) AS HAVING AN APPROXIMATE EPA ESTIMATED 240 MILES OF RANGE. THIS CASE HAS BEEN FILED AS A CLASS ACTION WHICH IS ALREADY PENDING IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CA, CASE NUMBER 5:19-CV-04596-VKD, BY THE NAMED CLASS PLAINTIFF AND REPRESENTATIVE DAVID RASMUSSEN. THIS OFFICE REPRESENTS MR. RASMUSSEN, AS WELL AS MR. LIN AND VARIOUS ADDITIONAL OWNERS OF THESE AFFECTED VEHICLES, INCLUDING RESIDENTS IN DIFFERENT STATES ACROSS THE COUNTY. TO DATE, TESLA HAS PROFFERED THE EXPLANATION THAT THE UPDATES WERE DONE IN ORDER TO PROMOTE THE HEALTH AND BATTERY LONGEVITY FOR THE VEHICLES, HOWEVER, THERE IS A CORRELATION BETWEEN THE AGE OF THESE CARS, THE RECENT FIRES, AND ANY CORRESPONDING WARRANTIES WITH THESE CARS BY WHICH TESLA APPEARS TO TRY AND AVOID. THUS, CUSTOMERS ARE LEFT COMPLETELY WITHOUT ANY REMEDY TO THE ISSUES CAUSED BY TESLA, AS NCDS ARBITRATORS ACROSS THE U.S. ARE UNABLE TO COME TO TERMS WITH THE FACT THAT TESLA HAS COMMITTED THESE ILLEGAL, UNFAIR, DECEPTIVE, AND FRAUDULENT ACTS, OR ARE UNABLE TO DUE TO THE LIMITED SCOPE AND REQUIREMENTS BY WHICH NCDS ARBITRATORS ARE BOUND TO.