NHTSA Complaint #11191480 — 2013 SUBARU CROSSTREK

I WOULD LIKE ANSWER TO WHY THE CVT WAS GIVEN AN EXTENDED WARRANTY AND IF THERE IS A FUTURE RECALL ON THIS TRANSMISSION DUE TO STALLING? I NEVER RECEIVED NOTICE OF THE 10 YEAR OR 100,000 MILE EXTENDED WARRANTY WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. MY CAR IS ABOVE THAT (123,000 MILES). I HAVE BEEN HAVING ISSUES WITH IT AND IT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH CVT PROBLEMS AND THE ESTIMATED REPAIR COST IS OVER $8,000. THE SUBARU DEALER TOLD ME THEY AREN'T EVEN ALLOWED SERVICE THE TRANSMISSION... IS THIS DUE TO THE PROBLEMS? I AM A SINGLE MOTHER ON A TEACHER'S SALARY THAT SAVED UP FOR TWO YEARS PRIOR TO PURCHASING THIS USED VEHICLE THREE YEARS AGO (2016). I FINALLY PAID OF MY CAR LAST MONTH AND WAS SO EXCITED TO BE ABLE TO FINALLY NOT HAVE A CAR PAYMENT AND BE ABLE TO FINALLY SAVE MORE MONEY FOR MY SON'S COLLEGE. NOW, I CAN'T EVEN SAFELY DRIVE MY SON TO SCHOOL OR MYSELF TO WORK IN MY SUBARU. WHY ARE ONLY THE LIVES OF PEOPLE'S CAR WHOSE MILEAGE UNDER 100,000 TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT? IF I CHOOSE TO CONTINUE DRIVING MY CAR AS IT IS, I RISK MY CAR STALLING OR TRANSMISSION FAILING CAUSING AN ACCIDENT. IF I DON'T DRIVE IT, I RISK MISSING WORK AND NOT BEING ABLE TO FEED MY SON. IT SEEMS LIKE SUBARU IS LOOKING OUT FOR THEIR BOTTOM LINE BY ISSUING A WARRANTY ON A KNOWN PROBLEM, RATHER THAN TAKING NECESSARY STEPS TO FIX THE PROBLEM.