NHTSA Complaint #10650388 — 2000 ACURA TL

I RECENTLY PURCHASED A PRE-OWNED 2000 ACURA TL OVER THE SUMMER AND DISCOVERED THAT THERE WAS A NOTICE TO THE OWNERS OF THESE VEHICLES IN 2004 TO HAVE THE 2ND GEAR OF THE TRANSMISSION INSPECTED FOR ABNORMALITIES DUE TO LACK OF LUBRICATION IN ALL VEHICLES, AND IF ABNORMALITIES WERE DISCOVERED THE TRANSMISSION WILL BE REPLACED, IN ALL VEHICLES OVER 15000 MILES. UPON READING THIS, AND DISCOVERING MY VEHICLE WAS NOT INSPECTED, I MADE AN APPOINTMENT WITH AN ACURA DEALER TO HAVE THIS ISSUE INVESTIGATED. WHEN THEY LOOKED AT THE TRANSMISSION THEY WERE INSTRUCTED TO INSTALL A KIT TO IMPROVE THE LUBRICATION. THEY ALSO INFORMED ME THAT BECAUSE THE PREVIOUS OWNER HAD SOME WORK PERFORMED ON THE TRANSMISSION, ON A DIFFERENT PART THAT ACURA HAD PROBLEMS WITH PREVIOUSLY, THAT THEY WOULD NOT INSPECT THE 2ND GEAR FOR ABNORMALITIES, EVEN THOUGH THEY FOUND SHAVINGS IN THE TRANSMISSION FLUID. THIS DECISION TO HALT THE INSPECTION WAS MADE BY ACURA CORPORATE DESPITE PLEAS FROM THE DEALERSHIP SERVICE MEN, MYSELF AND FAMILY MEMBERS. THIS VEHICLE HAS AN INCREASED CHANCE OF HAVING A TRANSMISSION LOCK UP, POTENTIALLY CREATING A CAR ACCIDENT AND HAS AN INCREASED POTENTIAL OF LOSS OF LIFE. THE SERVICE I RECEIVED FROM ACURA CORPORATE IN THE HANDLING OF THIS MATTER I FEEL WAS COMPLETELY UNSATISFACTORY, EVEN THOUGH THE DEALERSHIP SERVICEMEN GAVE AN EXCELLENT EFFORT FOR GREAT SERVICE. *TR