NHTSA Complaint #10586162 — 2004 CHRYSLER PACIFICA

UPON INSPECTION BY MULTIPLE CERTIFIED MECHANICS THEY NOTIFIED ME THAT CHRYSLER ISSUED A RECALL FOR ENGINE CRADLE FAILURE DUE TO EXCESSIVE RUST. TSB # 13-001-12. FOR SOME UNKNOWN REASON CHRYSLER HAS DECLARED THE PROBLEM ONLY EXIST FOR CERTAIN MONTHS IN 2004 HOWEVER MY CAR WAS BUILT IN LATE 2003 AND HAS THE SAME RUSTED AND FAILING PARTS. SO MY COMPLAINT IS HOW CAN A CAR MAKER SAY THE FAULTY PARTS CONDITION NOT EXIST BEFORE THEY FOUND IT? ALSO, HOW THE RECALL WINDOW IS LIMITED TO SUCH A SMALL WINDOW OF TIME WHEN THE PROBLEMS EXIST LONG BEFORE THEY RESPONDED? THIS MAKES ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE TO ME. THIS IS THE FIRST TIME IN MY LIFE I BOUGHT A CAR THAT HAS A CHASSIS PART FAILURE AND YET NO EFFORT OR WILLINGNESS BY THE MANUFACTURER TO NOTIFY OWNERS. I'D LIKE TO KNOW IF THE NHTSA HAS ANY FATALITY REPORTS DUE TO THIS PARTS FAILURE OR WHY IT WAS ISSUED IN THE FIRST PLACE? SINCE MY CAR DOES NOT HAVE THE 150K MILES THIS RECALL APPLIES TO HOW LONG WILL THE CAR BE SAFE TO DRIVE? *TR