NHTSA Complaint #10173859 — 2001 MERCEDES BENZ SLK

I AM AN OWNER OF A 2001 SLK 320. I HAVE HAD CHRONIC PROBLEMS WITH HEADLAMPS AND BRAKE LAMPS GOING OUT , BULBS MELTING IN LAMPS ON BRAKES AS WELL AS HEADLAMPS. IN THE BEGINNING THESE REPAIRS WERE PAID UNDER MANUF. WARRANTY. HOWEVER, I AM PAYING FOR REPLACEMENT BULBS, MOST RECENTLY A HEADLAMP PROBLEM I WILL HAVE TO HAVE REPLACED AT A COST CLOSE TO $600. TODAY I RECEIVED A RECALL FROM MERCEDES NOTICE FOR THE BRAKE LAMP PROBLEM. I QUESTION THAT THE SAME MAY BE TRUE OF HEADLIGHTS. MY CONDITION OF BRAKE AND HEADLIGHTS BEING REPLACED AS WELL AS A BRAKE LAMP REPLACED IN THE PAST, WAS SO CHRONIC, I ORDERED AND PAID OUT OF POCKET FOR ELECTRICAL TESTING ON MY CAR WHERE NOTHING WRONG WAS DISCOVERED. MY POINT HERE IS THAT I FEEL IN ADDITION TO THE BRAKE LIGHT PROBLEM ADDRESSED BY MERCEDES IN MY RECALL # 2006-080005, I BELIEVE IT WOULD BE REMISS FOR SAFETY PURPOSES TO NOT ANNOUNCE THAT I BELIEVE THE SAME CONDITION APPLIES TO MY SLK HEADLIGHTS. ALSO, FOR SUCH PROBLEMS ON THE BRAKE LIGHTS THAT EXISTED IN THE PAST, WHAT RECOURSE DO I HAVE IN MONIES I LAID OUT OF POCKET, PERTAINING TO THE CHRONIC BRAKE LIGHT PROBLEM IN MY SLK 320. THANK YOU. *NM