NHTSA Complaint #10852109 — 2008 MITSUBISHI LANCER
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM issue reported to NHTSA
Complaint Details
| ODI Number | 10852109 |
| Vehicle | 2008 MITSUBISHI LANCER |
| Component | ELECTRICAL SYSTEM |
| Date of Incident | |
| Date Filed | |
| Mileage | 95,000 miles |
| Crash | No |
| Fire | No |
| Injuries | 0 |
| Deaths | 0 |
| Vehicle Towed | No |
| State | NC |
Consumer Description
BLOWER MOTOR HAS FAILED THREE TIMES. BLOWER MOTORS ON LATER MANUFACTURED VEHICLES WERE RECALLED SEVERAL YEARS AGO BECAUSE THE BLOWER MOTOR MAY FAIL. THIS VEHICLE EXHIBITS THE SAME SYMPTOMS DESCRIBED AS THAT RECALL BUT IS OUTSIDE THE SCOPE.
Related Complaints for the 2008 MITSUBISHI LANCER
Other ELECTRICAL SYSTEM Complaints
#11611449
The contact owns a 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer. The contact stated that after a while the system would erase any safety in...
#11363572
MY SRS LIGHT JUST STARTED COMING ON A FEW YEARS AGO BEFORE WE WERE IN AN ACCIDENT. WHEN WE TOOK IT TO THE DEALER TO ...
#11139030
IN 2015 MY 2008 MITSUBISHI LANCER DID NOT PASS CA STATE SMOG. MY LOCAL MECHANIC DID THE NECESSARY TESTS AS DIRECTED B...
#10232892
MY SON WAS ATTEMPTING TO STOP AT A RED LIGHT WHEN THE BRAKES STARTED TO PULSE UNCONTROLLABLY, AND THE BRAKE PEDAL WHE...
#10205780
I PURCHASED A BRAND NEW 2008 MITSUBISHI LANCER IN APRIL 2007. AFTER ONLY OWNING THE CAR FOR 2 WEEKS IT WOULDN'T START...
Recent Complaints for the 2008 MITSUBISHI LANCER
#11611449
POWER TRAIN
The contact owns a 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer. The contact stated that after a while the system would erase any safety in...
#11560732
STRUCTURE:BODY
We had car at a car dealer and the manufacturer declined doing the recall on the car for corrison on the front crossm...
#11520768
ENGINE
The dealership that is repairing the drive belt recall, is attempting to charge me for the replacement of a damaged p...
#11489715
SUSPENSION
The contact owns a 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer. The contact stated while her daughter was driving 45 mph, the vehicle bega...
#11461954
SUSPENSION
Our car crashed after getting off the highway in NJ. This appears to be related to Safety Recall Report 20V-279. The ...