NHTSA Complaint #10788381 — 2010 NISSAN VERSA

I SUBMITTED A COMPLAINT IN OCTOBER OF 2014 REGARDING MY FAILED FRONT END SUSPENSION. SUCH ISSUE HAS SINCE GENERATED A RECALL. THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED THE SAME REPAIR DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED TO YOUR INVESTIGATOR. THEY WILL NOT CONSIDER MY REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST UNLESS I ALLOW A NISSAN SERVICE TECH TAKE MY FRONT END SUSPENSION APART AND RE-PERFORM THE REPAIR WORK COMPLETED BY A NON-NISSAN TECH IN OCTOBER. I AM ONLY REQUESTING REIMBURSEMENT OF PART COSTS AND NOT LABOR. I HAVE OFFERED TO ALLOW A NISSAN TECH TO INSPECT THE WORK, BUT THIS RESOLUTION HAS BEEN DEEM UNACCEPTABLE BY NISSAN. ESSENTIALLY, THEY PROTECT THEMSELVES AGAINST BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR REIMBURSEMENT DONE PRIOR TO RECALL UNLESS PERFORMED BY THEIR TECHNICIANS. IS THIS ENFORCEABLE? MORE IMPORTANTLY, THE COIL WAS THE ONLY PIECE OF THE SUSPENSION RECALLED DESPITE THE FACT THAT GASKETS WERE MISSING FROM THE ASSEMBLY WHICH LED TO METAL ON METAL CONTACT AND THEREFORE WEAKENED THE STRUT ASSEMBLY NOT THE ROAD SALT AS THEY INDICATE IN THEIR RECALL. DO I HAVE ANY RECOURSE? I WOULDN'T AUTHORIZE SUCH NONSENSE FOR A $ 139 REFUND BECAUSE IT JUST MAKES NO SENSE IN TERMS OF LOST TIME. STRUT 1 IMAGE IS THE FAILED STRUT ASSEMBLY. STRUT 2 IS THE FACTORY STRUT ASSEMBLY.