NHTSA Complaint #10369404 — 2005 FORD F-350 SD

DEAR COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JURIDICIAL DITRICT, COUNTY OF CAMBRIA, THE REASON FOR THIS NOTICE OF APPEAL TO LAST WEDNESDAYS ( 11/10/10 ) CIVIL CASE WITH FORD MOTOR COMPANY AND FORD DEALER [XXX] VERSUS MYSELF, AT DISTRICT MAGISTRATE HONORABLE XXX COURTROOM IS AS FOLLOWS BELOW: I REPRESENTED MYSELF TO ALL PARTIES WITH A CONDENSED " READERS DIGEST" VERSION OF MY LENGTHY, MUTIPLE THREE RING BINDERS OF SUPPORTING EVEIDENCE SIMPLY THINKING THAT TIME IS MONEY SO I BEST NOT WASTE EITHER. THIS MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE CONTIBUTED TO THE OUTCOME OF THE JUDGE RULING IN THE FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANTS. EITHER WAY I AM PLEAING TO APPEAL THE VERDICT AND PROVIDE THE ENTIRE WORD FOR WORD, LINE FOR LINE, PAGE BY PAGE, BINDER BY BINBER, FACTS. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT MY ATTORNEY AND / OR I SHALL PRESENT THIS IN A EXTREMELY MORE PRECISE AND DETAILED MANNER WITH EXHIBITS WHERE APLLICABLE TO A TEAM OF AT LEAST THREE ARBITRATION ATTORNEYS. THIS CASE CONCERNS MUCH MORE THAN JUST MONEY AT STAKE BUT ABOUT PRINCIPALS, TRUTH, COMMON COURTESY AND FACTS, AS A MIMINUM. MY HOPE IS THIS CASE CAN BRING TO LIGHT TO THE ENTIRE PUBLIC THE FAILURE OF THE MANUFACTURER ( FORD MOTOR COMPANY ) TO RECALL OVER LITERALLY MILLIONS OF VEHICLES FOR SEVERAL ENGINE COMPONENT FAILURES. ALSO, THE DEALERSHIP, [XXX] COULD OF HELPED ME WITH MY ENGINE FAILURE, AT A MINIMUM OF GOOD FAITH, AS A REPEAT CUSTOMER BUT CHOSE NOT TO. [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR