2003 LAND ROVER DEFENDER — Problems, Recalls & Safety Data
N/A
Safety Rating
3
Owner Complaints
0
Recalls
NO ACTIVE RECALLS
0
Service Bulletins
0
Investigations
Overview of the 2003 LAND ROVER DEFENDER
The 2003 LAND ROVER DEFENDER has received a total of 3 safety complaints filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The most commonly reported problems involve the Engine And Engine Cooling (1 complaint), Service Brakes Hydraulic (1 complaint), and Visibilitypower Window Devices And Controls (1 complaint).
Recalls for the 2003 LAND ROVER DEFENDER
There are no recalls on file with NHTSA for the 2003 LAND ROVER DEFENDER. No Active Recalls
Owner Complaints for the 2003 LAND ROVER DEFENDER
3 complaints have been filed with NHTSA for the 2003 LAND ROVER DEFENDER. Below is a breakdown by vehicle component.
Engine And Engine Cooling
Complaints: 1
Service Brakes Hydraulic
Complaints: 1
Visibilitypower Window Devices And Controls
Complaints: 1
| Component | Complaints | Crashes | Fires | Injuries | Deaths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engine And Engine Cooling | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Service Brakes Hydraulic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Visibilitypower Window Devices And Controls | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Most Recent Complaints
AT 30,000 MILES, WE TOOK THE VEHICLE IN TO BE "SERVICED" MAINLY BECAUSE ANOTHER MECHANIC TOLD US THAT THE OIL WAS 'GUNKED'. THE DEALER INFORMED US THAT THERE WAS NO PROBLEM WITH THE VEHICLE OR THE WARRANTY AND REPLACED THE OIL AT A CHARGE OF OVER $94.00. THEN AT 34,000, THE BRAKES SUDDENLY BEGAN TO GRIND AND THE BRAKE LIGHT CAME ON, WE TOOK IT TO THE DEALER AND THEY SAID IT WAS "NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR" AND CHARGED US OVER $355.00 TO FIX THE BRAKES. AFTER ANOTHER 1,000 MILES, THE LIGHT CAME ON AGAIN, WHEN WE CALLED THEM THEY TOLD US TO LEAVE IT WITH THEM FOR A FEW WEEKS AND REFUSED US A LOANER CAR. ALSO, THE REAR DRIVER SIDE WINDOW WOULD NOT ROLL UP AND THEY REPLACE IT BECAUSE IT WAS 'UNDER WARRANTY'. AT 46,000 MILES THE ENGINE BEGAN TO OVER HEAT. I TOOK IT TO THE NEAREST MECHANIC AND WAS INFORMED THAT THE OIL AGAIN WAS 'GUNKED UP' BECAUSE ANTI FREEZE HAD BEEN LEAKING INTO THE ENGINE. AFTER 3 WEEKS, THE DEALER "LAND ROVER OF TULSA' FIRST TOLD US THAT THE ENGINE WOULD HAVE TO BE REPLACED. THEN LAND ROVER INC TRIED TO TELL US THAT THE ENGINE WOULD BE OUR EXPENSE. THEY TRIED TO INFORM US THAT THE VEHICLE HAD NOT BEEN PROPERLY SERVICED (EVEN THOUGH WE HAD TAKEN IT IN SEVERAL TIMES AT CONSIDERABLE EXPENSE). THEY KEPT THE VEHICLE FOR 3 WEEKS, AND THEN REPLACED SOME PART, TOLD US TO WATCH THE COOLANT AND TO HAVE THE OIL CHANGED EVERY 6,000 MILES. AFTER 247 MILES, HALF A GALLON OF ANTIFREEZE WAS GONE AND THE ENGINE STARTED TO RUN "FUNNY AGAIN". EVEN THOUGH THE DEALER CLAIMED THAT NO ANTI FREEZE WAS IN THE OIL, THEY FORGOT TO CLEAN THE OIL CAP AFTER THEIR "SERVICE". I HAD IT TESTED BY AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC AND ANTI FREEZE WAS FOUND IN THE OIL CAP, WHICH PROVES ANTI FREEZE WAS IN THE OIL. ALSO, THEY CLAIMED A WHEEL BEARING WAS GOING OUT AND THEY WOULD ORDER THE PART AND FIX IT 'UNDER WARRANTY'. THEY SEEM CONFUSED THAT THEIR 'WARRANTY IS NOT A PICK AND CHOOSE TYPE WARRANTY. THIS VEHICLE IS OBVIOUSLY A LEMON. *JB
AT 30,000 MILES, WE TOOK THE VEHICLE IN TO BE "SERVICED" MAINLY BECAUSE ANOTHER MECHANIC TOLD US THAT THE OIL WAS 'GUNKED'. THE DEALER INFORMED US THAT THERE WAS NO PROBLEM WITH THE VEHICLE OR THE WARRANTY AND REPLACED THE OIL AT A CHARGE OF OVER $94.00. THEN AT 34,000, THE BRAKES SUDDENLY BEGAN TO GRIND AND THE BRAKE LIGHT CAME ON, WE TOOK IT TO THE DEALER AND THEY SAID IT WAS "NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR" AND CHARGED US OVER $355.00 TO FIX THE BRAKES. AFTER ANOTHER 1,000 MILES, THE LIGHT CAME ON AGAIN, WHEN WE CALLED THEM THEY TOLD US TO LEAVE IT WITH THEM FOR A FEW WEEKS AND REFUSED US A LOANER CAR. ALSO, THE REAR DRIVER SIDE WINDOW WOULD NOT ROLL UP AND THEY REPLACE IT BECAUSE IT WAS 'UNDER WARRANTY'. AT 46,000 MILES THE ENGINE BEGAN TO OVER HEAT. I TOOK IT TO THE NEAREST MECHANIC AND WAS INFORMED THAT THE OIL AGAIN WAS 'GUNKED UP' BECAUSE ANTI FREEZE HAD BEEN LEAKING INTO THE ENGINE. AFTER 3 WEEKS, THE DEALER "LAND ROVER OF TULSA' FIRST TOLD US THAT THE ENGINE WOULD HAVE TO BE REPLACED. THEN LAND ROVER INC TRIED TO TELL US THAT THE ENGINE WOULD BE OUR EXPENSE. THEY TRIED TO INFORM US THAT THE VEHICLE HAD NOT BEEN PROPERLY SERVICED (EVEN THOUGH WE HAD TAKEN IT IN SEVERAL TIMES AT CONSIDERABLE EXPENSE). THEY KEPT THE VEHICLE FOR 3 WEEKS, AND THEN REPLACED SOME PART, TOLD US TO WATCH THE COOLANT AND TO HAVE THE OIL CHANGED EVERY 6,000 MILES. AFTER 247 MILES, HALF A GALLON OF ANTIFREEZE WAS GONE AND THE ENGINE STARTED TO RUN "FUNNY AGAIN". EVEN THOUGH THE DEALER CLAIMED THAT NO ANTI FREEZE WAS IN THE OIL, THEY FORGOT TO CLEAN THE OIL CAP AFTER THEIR "SERVICE". I HAD IT TESTED BY AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC AND ANTI FREEZE WAS FOUND IN THE OIL CAP, WHICH PROVES ANTI FREEZE WAS IN THE OIL. ALSO, THEY CLAIMED A WHEEL BEARING WAS GOING OUT AND THEY WOULD ORDER THE PART AND FIX IT 'UNDER WARRANTY'. THEY SEEM CONFUSED THAT THEIR 'WARRANTY IS NOT A PICK AND CHOOSE TYPE WARRANTY. THIS VEHICLE IS OBVIOUSLY A LEMON. *JB
AT 30,000 MILES, WE TOOK THE VEHICLE IN TO BE "SERVICED" MAINLY BECAUSE ANOTHER MECHANIC TOLD US THAT THE OIL WAS 'GUNKED'. THE DEALER INFORMED US THAT THERE WAS NO PROBLEM WITH THE VEHICLE OR THE WARRANTY AND REPLACED THE OIL AT A CHARGE OF OVER $94.00. THEN AT 34,000, THE BRAKES SUDDENLY BEGAN TO GRIND AND THE BRAKE LIGHT CAME ON, WE TOOK IT TO THE DEALER AND THEY SAID IT WAS "NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR" AND CHARGED US OVER $355.00 TO FIX THE BRAKES. AFTER ANOTHER 1,000 MILES, THE LIGHT CAME ON AGAIN, WHEN WE CALLED THEM THEY TOLD US TO LEAVE IT WITH THEM FOR A FEW WEEKS AND REFUSED US A LOANER CAR. ALSO, THE REAR DRIVER SIDE WINDOW WOULD NOT ROLL UP AND THEY REPLACE IT BECAUSE IT WAS 'UNDER WARRANTY'. AT 46,000 MILES THE ENGINE BEGAN TO OVER HEAT. I TOOK IT TO THE NEAREST MECHANIC AND WAS INFORMED THAT THE OIL AGAIN WAS 'GUNKED UP' BECAUSE ANTI FREEZE HAD BEEN LEAKING INTO THE ENGINE. AFTER 3 WEEKS, THE DEALER "LAND ROVER OF TULSA' FIRST TOLD US THAT THE ENGINE WOULD HAVE TO BE REPLACED. THEN LAND ROVER INC TRIED TO TELL US THAT THE ENGINE WOULD BE OUR EXPENSE. THEY TRIED TO INFORM US THAT THE VEHICLE HAD NOT BEEN PROPERLY SERVICED (EVEN THOUGH WE HAD TAKEN IT IN SEVERAL TIMES AT CONSIDERABLE EXPENSE). THEY KEPT THE VEHICLE FOR 3 WEEKS, AND THEN REPLACED SOME PART, TOLD US TO WATCH THE COOLANT AND TO HAVE THE OIL CHANGED EVERY 6,000 MILES. AFTER 247 MILES, HALF A GALLON OF ANTIFREEZE WAS GONE AND THE ENGINE STARTED TO RUN "FUNNY AGAIN". EVEN THOUGH THE DEALER CLAIMED THAT NO ANTI FREEZE WAS IN THE OIL, THEY FORGOT TO CLEAN THE OIL CAP AFTER THEIR "SERVICE". I HAD IT TESTED BY AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC AND ANTI FREEZE WAS FOUND IN THE OIL CAP, WHICH PROVES ANTI FREEZE WAS IN THE OIL. ALSO, THEY CLAIMED A WHEEL BEARING WAS GOING OUT AND THEY WOULD ORDER THE PART AND FIX IT 'UNDER WARRANTY'. THEY SEEM CONFUSED THAT THEIR 'WARRANTY IS NOT A PICK AND CHOOSE TYPE WARRANTY. THIS VEHICLE IS OBVIOUSLY A LEMON. *JB
Safety Rating for the 2003 LAND ROVER DEFENDER
NHTSA has not yet tested the 2003 LAND ROVER DEFENDER in its New Car Assessment Program.
Technical Service Bulletins for the 2003 LAND ROVER DEFENDER
No technical service bulletins have been reported for this vehicle.
NHTSA Investigations for the 2003 LAND ROVER DEFENDER
There are no NHTSA defect investigations on record for this vehicle.
Other Model Years of the LAND ROVER DEFENDER
- 1999 LAND ROVER DEFENDER — 1 complaint
- 2001 LAND ROVER DEFENDER — 1 complaint
- 2002 LAND ROVER DEFENDER — 4 complaints
- 2003 LAND ROVER DEFENDER (current)
Other LAND ROVER Models
- LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER — 1,234 total complaints
- LAND ROVER FREELANDER — 798 total complaints
- LAND ROVER DISCOVERY — 745 total complaints
- LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER SPORT — 745 total complaints
- LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER EVOQUE — 539 total complaints
- LAND ROVER DISCOVERY II — 279 total complaints
- LAND ROVER LR3 — 259 total complaints
- LAND ROVER DISCOVERY SPORT — 245 total complaints